The Hiring Process
How to make recruiting and interviewing better for everyone.
What’s wrong with recruitment?
“What do you think is most broken about recruiting for the type of work we do?” We knew that priming respondents with the word “broken” would elicit strong responses—and this question got many.
In a moment where so many are unemployed, frustration abounds about the ways companies make getting a content job difficult.
Top themes
43% - Too many steps and requires too much free work and time
30% - Companies/recruiters don’t understand the job they’re hiring for
14% - Unrealistic expectations of experience or skills required to apply
6% - Companies do not share salary information
4% - Lack of follow-up, getting “ghosted”
Too many steps, too much free work.
Respondents told us that the typical interview process can have anywhere from three to seven rounds, which requires a significant time investment that exhausts candidates.
Companies ask candidates for case studies and/or writing exercises, which can take days to complete, making it unfair on people with caring responsibilities or limited free time. If writing exercises are related to the company’s product, there is the added issue that companies are essentially asking people to do unpaid work for them.
Portfolios are also a massive time-suck to keep up to date, which again hurt those with caring responsibilities and limited free time. Jobseekers are also frustrated that companies are asking for both a portfolio and an exercise, rather than one or the other.
Requiring 3+ interviews and take-home assignments. I once went through six rounds of interviews and didn’t get the job, plus I had to do a three-hour panel interview with them and take a ridiculous IQ test.
—Senior content designer, USA
The process is sooo time-consuming and often requires extra design work outside of the case studies submitted. This heavily favors people who are single, well-off financially, childfree, have flexible schedules, etc. (i.e. people with privilege).
—Content designer, USA
If you have a family, it’s really hard to find the time to create a portfolio, network, upskill (in my spare time), write applications, interview, etc… It feels out of range to me.
—Content designer, Sweden
Companies and recruiters don’t understand what they’re hiring for.
A frequent complaint was that companies are hiring content roles, but don’t actually know what the content role they are hiring for is, what content professionals do on a daily basis, or what value they bring.
Recruiters also seem to confuse content- and design-related roles when seeking out applicants, leading to hiring teams getting sent job applicants that aren’t the right fit for the role.
Recruiters still don’t know what we do. They still believe we’re: a. designers b. copywriters with coding skills c. magicians who can transform their poorly designed product into a unicorn.
—Lead content strategist, Italy
Many recruiters do not *get* what content design is. We’re actively recruiting for a mid- to senior-level content designer, and recruiters keep sending me marketing copywriters. I’ve met with each recruiter to go over the specifics in detail, but it’s not clicking.
—Senior manager of content design, USA
Experience and skill requirements are unrealistic.
We also heard that companies are not hiring entry-level content designers, or are asking for too many years of experience in a field that’s relatively young. They’re expecting candidates to be at a senior level, but not putting the investment into training and upskilling entry-level content professionals so they get to a senior level.
Respondents told us that companies are skipping over candidates because they haven’t used the exact tools used in the job they are applying to, or they haven’t done the exact same type of work in their current or previous roles. There seems to be a lack of trust in a candidate’s potential to succeed in a role, in favor of marking jobseekers against an unrealistic checklist of skills and experience.
Very few entry-level/early-career opportunities. Hard to get interviews when you don’t have 5+ years experience in the field. Would love to have companies interested in hiring for my potential, not just experience.
—Design writer, USA
The people hiring for content designers too often have little to no idea what the day-to-day work is like, and end up focusing too much on particular details or skills that can be honed or taught on the job, and missing what’s really important and much harder to learn. For example: it doesn’t matter if someone made a spelling mistake on their CV, or they haven’t used Figma before—it’s a tool and they’ll learn if they practice and get support from their team.
—Content design lead, Finland
Too much focus on portfolio content having the exact right experience fit for the new role. Just because I didn’t write for your specific flow type doesn’t mean I can’t!
—Senior UX writer, USA
Just tell us the salary, please.
It wastes people’s time to put effort into an application only to find out the role doesn’t meet their salary expectations, and respondents told us this was a common problem. We also heard concerns about pay parity and how content roles are paid in comparison to other roles in a design team.
A majority of recruiters still don’t list the salary up front and so you have to waste a lot of time making sure a position is a match for your skills.
—UX copywriter, USA
Lack of transparency around compensation. Even if a company posts a salary range, I want to know that the salary they advertise is equivalent to any designer at the same level.
—Principal UX writer, USA
Getting ghosted is common, and feels terrible.
Applicants also shared that they put so much effort into a multi-round recruitment process, only to never hear back with any feedback as to why they didn’t get the role.
Ghosting is also bad. Always bad. Give feedback to people. Value the effort they put into multiple-step, sometimes months-long recruitment processes.
—Senior content designer, Netherlands
Having at least 5 steps INCLUDING HOMEWORK in every. SINGLE. interview process, and being ghosted consistently.
—Manager, content design, Canada
 
What can be done to improve recruitment?
In addition to their frustrations, many respondents also shared suggestions for ways to improve the recruitment process. Here are the top themes we found.
Create more ethical and inclusive hiring practices.
Pay people for their time, especially if you ask them to do a task on your product.
Consider whether you really need a portfolio or writing task to assess a candidate’s skills, and avoid asking for both.
Cut down the number of interview rounds.
Give clear guidelines and rubrics for how you evaluate candidates in the various application elements.
Don’t ghost—tell candidates the outcomes and offer them feedback.
List the salary and how it compares to other roles in the company.
If you want my vision and actionable steps to overhaul your KB or writing design system, hire me or at least pay me as a contractor. Ideation and project planning is a skillset worthy of compensation.
—Technical and UX writer, USA
The UX interview process should be a 30-minute telephone/zoom screen to evaluate fit for the role, followed by a 1-2 hour zoom/in-person to meet the team and answer specific skills questions. Followed by a recap meeting with the design manager to gauge if the candidate enjoyed meeting the folks and learning more about the role.
—Senior content designer, USA
I wish each company would include a rubric by which they were judging portfolios and I could adjust each of my portfolios accordingly before submitting. Instead I just have to guess what they’re judging it by.
—Content designer, USA
Upskill hiring managers and recruiters.
Respondents told us that hiring managers and recruiters need to learn more about the content roles they are hiring for. Companies could also benefit from finding recruiters from content backgrounds, who know what skills and potential to look for in applicants.
I’d urge hiring managers and recruiters to attend conferences, shadow current content designers proud of how their orgs work, and emulate that in how they look for their next addition.
—UX writer, USA
We need more recruiters with content backgrounds. They will be able to see strengths that designers or tech recruiters just won’t get.
—Content strategist, USA
Hire for more entry-level roles.
UX content professionals want organizations to consider people’s potential over experience, and trust that they can transfer their current skillset to a new context.
People should hire based on ability and potential, not just someone who has done that exact thing before. It discounts future great employees and forces people to remain in specific verticals. That means people don’t grow and diversify their skills, and we don’t get new perspectives which ultimately hurts the work. It’s a lose-lose when we aren’t open-minded in our hiring practices.
—Senior content designer, USA
They are more often than not looking for someone with 10 years of experience when there are plenty of capable juniors who haven’t been given a chance.
—Technical writer, Sweden
Questions for community discussion
What would a more ethical recruitment process look like that is considerate of people’s time?
What can we do to better educate recruiters and others hiring for UX content roles—without further stretching ourselves thin?
What would it look like to advocate for more salary transparency in our organizations and across community groups? What barriers are in the way?
What supports are needed to make it easier to hire for junior roles? What misconceptions need to be addressed?
LAST SECTION
NEXT SECTION